The proposal aims to:
- preserve key ocean view corridors from Eric Street, Marine Parade and adjoining public spaces
- ensure the majority of the roof deck remains publicly accessible, with upgrades including improved surfacing and drainage, seating and furniture, lighting, and a public water bottle filling station
- ensure these improvements are intended to benefit all users of the space, and not only sauna patrons.
From a broader perspective, the proposal provides a commercial opportunity that helps support the operations of the NCSLSC. The Town itself would receive some modest commercial benefit for the wider community. Council considered the possible commercial terms for the sauna should it be approved and lease amended on
28 April 2026. The ski shed and roof area is located on Crown land that is reserved for regional open space, currently leased by the Town to the NCSLSC to support its lifesaving and community activities. Under the proposal, the Club would remain the primary leassee. Any sauna operation would occur through a sub‑lease or licence arrangement between the Club and the operator, subject to Town approval and relevant State Government consents. Any variation to the existing lease would require formal approval, and would need to clearly define responsibilities for maintenance, safety, insurance and compliance. Council's position is that all costs, risks, and removal obligations must sit with the Club and/or operator, not with the community. Council would retain its role as land manager, with ongoing oversight to ensure any use remains consistent with the public interest and the land’s recreational purpose.
Background
Over recent years, Council has received community feedback about the informal use of the NCSLSC ski shed roof at 151 Marine Parade, Cottesloe (adjacent to Magic Apple). In June 2022, Council expressed a desire to see this space activated in a positive community manner and take proactive steps with the surf club in this regard The NCSLSC subsequently approached the Town about the possibility of using part of the ski shed roof for a sauna facility. At the OCM held on 22 April 2025, Council adopted a set of guiding principles for activation and development of the ski shed roof. These principles were established before any detailed proposal was considered to ensure that any proposal would be assessed against clear expectations relating to scale, siting, character and design quality, protection of ocean views, demountable construction, ongoing public access, and risk and cost arrangements.
The Guiding Principles are as follows:
- Development is to be single storey, located on the northern boundary, limited to no more than 33% of the total site area, with an east-west orientation designed to preserve the existing ocean view corridor from the corner of Eric Street and Marine Parade.
- Any structures must be compatible with the character of the surrounding built form.
- All improvements at the conclusion of the lease term are to be removed at the proponent’s cost, and the site returned to its original condition.
- The proposal must include secure locker facilities.
- The Club and/or operator is to assume all risks and costs associated with the development and indemnify the Town against liabilities arising from installation and operation of the structure.
At the OCM held on 28 April 2026, Council considered proposed commercial terms for the lease of the ski shed roof and resolved that the decision remain open subject to the outcome of development approval and community consultation. It noted that the Town will consult the community on the proposal and will bring the outcome of consultation back to Council for its consideration in determining whether to approve the proposed changes to the existing lease of the site.
OCM 28 April 2026 Agenda
Proposal Approval
The Council endorsed the proposal at the Council Meeting on 25 August 2026. The Council's recommendation will now be provided to the WAPC for final approval. This decision was informed by the previously established Guiding Principles for this development, and the Town's lease agreement with NCSLSC, in conjunction with community consultation.
Town Officers consider the proposal consistent with Council’s Guiding Principles, as it is limited to the northern third of the rooftop, retains and improves the remaining public area, and preserves the view corridor. The proposal provides recreational and community benefits. While concerns regarding the loss of community gathering and public space are acknowledged, the Guiding Principles had anticipated and sought to address the impact. Parking, traffic and amenity impacts are factors, and Town Officers consider these impacts are manageable through planning and lease conditions, including an Operational Management Plan. The public realm should be managed to a high standard as the Town wishes to encourage the community to continue to use and enjoy an improved public realm. Having regard to the objectives and intent of the Town’s Beach Policy 2004, the proposal presents an opportunity to enhance the foreshore experience while maintaining public access and delivering public realm improvements. The temporary and reversible nature of the sauna provides a sound basis for Council to recommend conditional support to the WAPC.
Community Consultation
Community consultation was conducted between 29 May and 2 July 2026. Letters were sent to nearby businesses and landowners/occupiers advising of the consultation (including those to the eastern side of Hamersley and Gadsdon Streets and to Eileen Street). Signage was placed on site, and a drop in information session was held in June 2026, attended by Alchemy Sauna and Town staff.
The proposal generated substantial interest, with 4626 page views made to the Town’s ‘Engage’ website. The Town received 316 submissions via email and through the survey on the website. All are listed in the ‘Schedule of Submissions’ shown on Attachment D.
Overall, there was strong support expressed from approximately 72% of the submissions. In terms of locations of submitters, 136 were from Cottesloe residents, 66 from outside the Town and 114 submitters didn’t provide addresses. Of the 136 Cottesloe submitters, the majority, 92 were in support (68%), and, 44 (32%) were objecting. No submissions were received from local businesses.